Question
Guidelines for the literature review: The purpose of this assignment is to apply the knowledge and understanding of epidemiological research that you have gained from the lecture series to evaluate and critique published epidemiological research.
The structure of your literature review should include Introduction, Summary of Original Research (the 7 attached articles not other references), Discussion (using other valid references), and Conclusion. By reviewing and critiquing existing epidemiological research ( the 7 attached original articles), including evaluating the strength of the epidemiological evidence for and against the chosen topic found in the current literature, you should gain a better understanding of epidemiological methods and their strengths and weaknesses. You could summarise the information from the original research articles to comment on the validity and significance of each of the studies.
In your discussion, you should consider whether the differences between the conclusions of the various studies might be explained by methodological factors.
For example:
• What research methods were used?
• What methodological limitations may have contributed to the results?
• Do different research methods yield different results?
• What are the limitations of each of the studies?
• Do you think that the conclusions of the various studies might be influenced by:
– Choice of research design?
– Sampling biases and sample size differences?
– Measurement techniques?
– Other sources of error/bias/confounding?
– Have the authors discussed the limitations of their research?
In your Conclusion, you should finish with your own conclusion whether you think the hypothesis is true or not.
References: You must use a standardized and consistent referencing procedure APA style. Please be sure to include all references that you used, also add any additional reading you did that was referred to in your essay (eg in the Introduction when you are setting the scene).
Answer
Name of student:
Course name:
Class name:
Date assignment due:
Contents
When does mother to child transmission of hepatitis C virus occur?. 15
Strengths and Weaknesses and Errors. 23
Literature Review for 7 Original Articles in Epidemiology and Research Design Subject
Abstract
The objective of the study was to determine whether research evidence supports using cesarean section for reducing mother to baby transmission of hepatitis C during labor and birth. The method used involved an epidemiological analysis of seven articles. The researches that were analyzed had been done using various methods; that is, prospective cohort study; pooled retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data; multivariate analyses; and clinical and virological investigations. The findings were that the cesarean section has no protective effect in the transmission of HCV.
Introduction
Hepatitis C (HCV) is a clinical infection that is important, affecting about 170 million people all over the world, that is, about 3% of the world population. The infection is a health concern among public health authorities worldwide. The disease has been indicated as a significant cause of chronic and acute hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis.
ORDER SIMILAR PAPER NOW
The primary mode of transmission among adults is through intravenous drug injection in cases where needs are shared. Before screening for hepatitis C was introduced in the form of a standard blood transfusion measure, blood transfusion was a major route for transmission for children and infants.
Antenatal HCV infection rates vary the world over, with figures ranging between 1% and 2.5% in most European countries and above 10% in the majority of sub-Saharan Africa. Studies have shown that prevalence rates in some parts of Egypt could be as high as 40%. Today, infection rates depend on the number of mothers who are infected. This paper analyzes seven studies that investigate the mother-to-child transmission of HCV infections.
Methods
This study was in the form of a literature review of seven different studies on the effect of cesarean section and other confounding factors on vertical transmission of HCV. The research question was Does the research evidence support using cesarean section for reducing mother to baby transmission of hepatitis C during labor and birth? The samples used in each of the seven studies were compared, and multivariate and bivariate measures were used to determine the effects of various factors in the transmission of HCV infection from mother to child.
A Significant Sex—but Not Elective Cesarean Section—Effect on Mother-to-Child Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus Infection
Methods
Study design: In this study, HCV diagnoses were done before delivery and the women who were found to be HCV-infected were enrolled at 33 EPHN centers. Data on the mother’s likely HCV acquisition mode was recorded. The HCV status of children was also determined.
Research question: The research question was: should mothers be discouraged from undergoing elective CS or to breastfeed their infants on the basis of their HCV status alone?
Sampling: The sample consisted of pregnant women who were HCV-infected, and their infants, who were assessed for HCV status immediately after birth. The data was analyzed using STATA 8 (Stata Corporation) after being entered into an access database. Proportions were compared using X2 proportions. It was found out that mothers should not be discouraged from breastfeeding or delivering through elective CS on account of their HCV status alone.
HCV infection remains a major public health problem in society and especially during pregnancy. Risk transmission factors should be identified in order for the appropriate interventions to be put in place. It is against this backdrop that European Pediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network (2005) carried out a study of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) mother-to-child transmission. The study, according to European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network, was motivated by poor quantification of various risk factors that contribute to the spread of this disease.
The research took the form of a multicenter prospective study whereby HCV-infected mothers, as well as their infants, were tested. Those children who had a polymerase chain reaction of HCV RNA that is equal to or greater than 2 and/or any anti-HCV antibodies within the 18-month duration since birth were considered to have been infected.
The researchers found out that the vertical transmission rate of HCV was 6.2 percent while the confidence level was 95 %. The likelihood of girls being infected was twice as much as that of boys. The caesarian section did not have any significant effect on the rate of infection for both boys and girls. For HCV vertical transmission, the elective cesarean section (CS) did not have a protective effect. Women with a co-infection of HCV and HIV transmitted HCV readily compared to women with an infection of HCV only. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Maternal history of the patients’ injection drug use, breastfeeding and prematurity did not have a significant association with the transmission.
The transmission was very frequent among viremic women, although it was also noted to occur among a few nonviremic women as well. From this study, it was concluded that women should not be discouraged from breastfeeding or being exposed to an elective CS solely on the basis of HCV infection. The sex-association finding was very intriguing and it is probably a reflection of biological differences in response and susceptibility to infection.
The finding that elective CS delivery has no protective effect on the risk HCV transmission risk is very significant and it is poised to affect the approach that is taken in dealing with mother-to-child transmission. However, for mothers of infected children, the duration of ROM was noted to be significantly longer than that of mothers of uninfected children. Through multivariate analysis, the finding relating to co-infected women being more likely to transmit the virus appeared to be not statistically significant.
In a world where 3% of the entire world’s population is infected with the HCV virus, the findings are very significant. Estimates of mother-to-child transmission risks range between 3% and 10%, something about which researchers have not been very enthusiastic about when it comes to research work. In fact, a majority of researchers have been focusing on only infant feeding and mode of feeding as the expense of statistical analyses. Focus on the former areas is motivated by the widely held notion that they are very amenable to intervention. Little attention is given to retrospective studies and analyses, a situation that makes the available findings on vertical transmissions lack sufficient statistical power.
Maternal HCV load seems like a predominant risk factor of HCV mother-to-child transmission. This, though, has not yet been fully quantified in in-depth studies. However, it is supported by consistent findings that indicate an increase in risk among women who are co-infected with both HCV and HIV. For these women, it is thought that HCV loads are secondary to the immunosuppression that is HIV-driven. However, HIV positive women are today being treated using potent antiretroviral therapy (ART) which plays a crucial role of improving response to immunity as well as reducing HIV transmission. The issue of whether such a form of treatment has an impact on HCV transmission remains to be addressed by medical researchers.
Effects of mode of delivery and infant feeding on the risk of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis C virus
Methods
Research design: prospectively collected data was used in a design Pooled retrospective analysis.
Research question: do infant feeding and the mode of delivery have an effect on the risk of transmission of HCV from mother to child?
Sampling: HCV positive mothers and their children provided data around delivery time in 24 centers set up by the European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network.
Measures: children whose test results showed that they had an HCV RNA polymerase chain reaction of >2 positives in the test results and/or in the anti-HCV antibodies when they were older than 18 months of age were considered to have been be infected with HCV. Other measures included mode of delivery, maternal HIV coinfection, receipt of ART during pregnancy, birth weight (in grams), maternal HCV viremia, gestational age (incompleted weeks) and type of feeding. Elective cesarean section (CS) delivery was found to have no protective effect on HCV vertical transmission.
The European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network (2001) set out to find out the effects that infant feeding and the mode of delivery have on the risk of transmission of Hepatitis C virus transmission from mother to child. Prospectively collected data were analyzed using pooled retrospective analysis. The findings of the research were such that both avoidances of breastfeeding and elective caesarian section could not be recommended for women with hepatitis C Virus infection only. However, in the case of HIV-infected women, both avoidance of breastfeeding and undergoing caesarian section delivery are strengthened in case they are also infected with HCV.
The background of the study was described as manifesting itself in unclear research findings regarding vertical transmission. According to European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network, (2001), the confirmation that vertical (mother-to-child) transmission of HCV occurs has heralded efforts aimed at identifying factors that are possibly associated with the risk of a child getting an HCV infection from the mother. Additionally, maternal HIV co-infection has also been noted to increase the risk of HCV vertical transmission.
Additionally, Hepatitis C virus viremia remains a risk factor for both HCV-infected patients and HCV/HIV-infected women. However, it is rare for transmission to take place from non-viraemic women. A suggestion has also been made to the effect that women with HCV virus that has been acquired through injecting drug use have a much higher likelihood of transmitting the HCV to their children.
Interest in various effects of infant feeding and mode of delivery also remains high in the European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network’s (2001) research. For instance, it has been noted that there is an increase in the risk of transmission among children who are vaginally delivered compared to those who are born through Caesarian delivery. However, the statistical significance of these studies was highly questionable; many of these studies did not have the power to detect, in some cases, the infected children were less than 10, and the issue still remains unresolved (European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network, 2001).
ORDER SIMILAR PAPER NOW
The research was carried out in the form of a two-page questionnaire, which included two questions on the mode of delivery, maternal HIV infection and breastfeeding status. Definitions of the infection status were provided in all the four participating centers. One form was filled for every mother-child pair by local coordinators using data that had been prospectively collected in local databases and patient notes. Emphasis was put on mothers who had been born to mothers with HCV on or after the first day of the year 1992. Children with a history of blood transfusion were excluded from the study.
Various factors were found to be associated with the infection status of the child. These factors included mode of delivery, infant feeding, and HIV co-infection. Fifty percent of all children did not have their breastfeeding status recorded, 10% of whom were found to suffer from HCV. Five hundred and three women (35.4%) were co-infected with HIV and HCV (European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network, 2001).It was also confirmed that maternal HIV co-infection had a significant effect on the increased risk of HCV infection. The multivariate analyses failed to provide any evidence of an association between type of infant feeding or mode of delivery and the risk of HCV infection among women who are infected with hepatitis C only.
Prevalence and Clinical Course of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection and Rate of HCV Vertical Transmission in a Cohort of 15,250 Pregnant Women
Methods
Study design: the prevalence of HCV infection was determined through clinical and virological investigations of 15,250 pregnant women.
Research question: what is the natural clinical course and prevalence of vertical transmission of HCV through utero and perinatal risk factors?
Sampling: the sample was chosen from consecutive pregnant women living within 20 km in Bergamo, Northern Italy.
Measures: EIA III was used to test the prevalence rate while recombinant immunoblot assay III was used for confirmation purposes. The rate of HCV transmission was not noted to be influenced by the type of feeding or delivery, or the mother’s HIV status.
Conte (2000) set out to investigate the prevalence and natural course of chronic hepatitis C infection by evaluating 15250 pregnant women from Northern Italy while at the same time assessing the HCV perinatal and vertical transmission. Conte (2000) note that many studies have been previously done on HCV infection before, with the anti-HCV positivity frequency being reported to range between 0.7% and 4.4 %, while the rate of viremia has been noted to range between 63% and 67%. However, Conte (2000) also indicates that there are only a few published studies that investigate the infection patterns of HCV during pregnancy.
Evaluation of vertical transmission of HCV, according to Conte (2000) has been done through several studies whereby in one series, the transmission was noted to range between 0% and 20%, with the mean rating being 5%. An additional note was also provided relating to the decline in the rate of sexual transmission of HCV and the drop in the posttransfusion hepatitis risk. In this case, Conte (2000) predicted that future interest in studies relating to mother-to-child HCV transmission would increase merely because of a decrease in other risk factors.
The patients who were studied in Conte (2000) were recruited between 1995 and 1998. All the women were requested to undergo an aspartate transaminase (AST) test and then they were taken through clinical evaluations within the first months of pregnancy. All the participants had to give written, informed consent before participating.
In 259 cases (71%), the delivery was vaginal, whereas delivery by means of the Cesarean section was reported in 106 (29%) cases. The research also involved screening of the participants for HCV-RNA positivity or negativity. It emerged that 72% of all the anti-HCV women who participated were viremic. This figure is comparable to the one that had been observed among blood donors as well as in the general population. The findings of the study were in line with those that had been obtained in some limited number of cases in the past (Conte).
Mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis C virus: evidence for preventable peripartum transmission
Methods
Study design: Prospective cohort study
Research question: Is there evidence for preventable peripartum transmission of HCV for Mother-to-child?
Sampling: 441 mother-child pairs
Measures: mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) was measured with regard to timing as well as a comparison between the risks of elective CS and those of vaginal delivery.
It was found out that HCV/HIV co-infection rate was higher compared to that of mothers who were not HIV-infected. HCV transmission risk was lower when CS was done before the membrane rupture compared to vaginal delivery.
Gibb et al (2000) carried out a study on mother-to-child transmission of HCV whereby in the background to study, it was noted that there exists little information on the topic of investigation. Additionally, no interventions had been done to decrease the transmission rates of the disease (Gibb et al, 2000).
Using data from HCV-infected women as well as their infants, Gibb et al (2000) embarked on a probabilistic model to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of PCR tests in three Ireland hospitals and in the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit. The time to HCV-antibody loss in infants who were not infected was also determined.
The findings were that by eight months, about 50% of all uninfected infants were noted to become HCV-negative. By 13 months, this figure had risen to 95%. Out of the 441 mother-child pairs that were studied, sensitivity was represented by only 22% while the estimated specificity of PCR in the case of HCV RNA was 97%. Most significantly, the vertical transmission rate was noted to be 6.7%, about 3 times higher than those pairs who were HIV co-infected. The HIV figure took into consideration adjustments made in order to accommodate other intervening variables. However, delivery through the caesarean section was associated with a lower transmission risk when it was done before membrane rupture.
According to Gibb et al (2000), the study revealed, among other things, that HCV transmission takes place predominantly around delivery time. This is indicated by the low sensitivity of HCV RNA immediately after birth. If these findings relating to the cesarean section are confirmed in future studies, then it will be necessary for medical practitioners to reconsider the conventional medical procedures relating to antenatal HCV testing (Gibb et al, 2000).
The findings relating to vertical transmission risks among HCV-infected women who had no HIV infection were consistent with the results of previous studies. However, Gibb et al (2000) note that in one of the previous studies, there was no summary estimate due to a lack of heterogeneity across various small studies. The study by Gibb et al (2000) was larger in size and scope compared to these smaller, inconclusive studies. Just like in previous studies, the current study showed HCV/HIV co-infection rates to be three times higher compared to that of HIV-negative women. As it had been previously suggested, this difference could be due to a high HCV viral load that is associated with immunodeficiency (Gibb et al, 2000).
Increased Risk of Mother-to-Infant Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus by Intrapartum Infantile Exposure to Maternal Blood
Method
Study design: logistical regression analysis of clinical and virological data.
Research question: what risk factors increase mother-to-infant HCV transmission infection during intrapartum infantile exposure to maternal blood?
Sampling: seventy-three HCV-infected pregnant who soon gave birth to 73 infants. The findings were that infantile hypoxia, high maternal viremia, and intrapartum exposure increased HCV transmission risk.
High maternal viremia, intrapartum exposure to maternal blood that is virus-contaminated and infantile hypoxia increase the risk of HCV transmission in the process of vaginal deliveries (Steininger et al, 2003). In a study of the risk of mother-to-infant transmission of HCV, Steininger et al (2003) found out that cesarean section can reduce the HCV transmission risk only in selected cases.
The study was done using clinical and virological data from 73 pregnant women who were infected with HCV. The mothers had given birth to 74 children. The data from these two sources were merged retrospectively through logistic regression analysis, in order to investigate various risk factors for HCV vertical transmission. In the study, 82% of the mothers who turned out to be HCV-RNA–positive were HCV-infected. Ten percent of the women were co-infected with the HIV virus. Nine children were infected with HCV, one was HIV-infected but none was found to be HIV-HCV co-infected (Steininger et al, 2003).
Among all vaginal deliveries, a higher mean HCV load of mothers who had transmitted HCV to their infants was recorded in comparison to that of those who did not transmit the virus. The risk of virus-contamination was increased by the reduction of the pH of the umbilical cord blood or the incidences of vaginal or perineal laceration during delivery.
In an introduction to the study, Steininger et al (2003) noted that in developed countries, the majority of new infections of HCV are acquired in the process of injection drug use (IDU). Although vertical transmission from the mother to the infant still remains rare during delivery, with all reported average transmission rates ranging between 5% and 10%, it remains the predominant mode through which infants acquire HCV (Steininger et al, 2003).
Steininger et al (2003) also report the controversy that exists on the issue of the threat of the high maternal virus load that supposedly poses a high transmission risk. Furthermore, the timing of perinatal transmission also remains uncertain. Additionally, there is a limited understanding of all the obstetrical factors influencing HCV vertical transmission (Steininger et al, 2003). The uncertainty about risk factors influencing vertical transmission is said to stand in contrast to that of HCV-1, where all the risk factors have been clearly identified, that is, vaginal delivery, RNA level, and plasma HIV-1 level.
In the study carried out by Steininger et al (2003), the study population consisted of HCV-infected women who had been put understudy at the University of Vienna, Vienna, and who had given birth in between the years 1994 and 1999. In the virological investigation, HCV antibodies were determined while during the clinical investigation, questionnaires were used to assess clinical data provided by HCV-infected mothers. The questionnaires were sent to mothers and their respective gynecologists soon after delivery as well as thorough reviews of case obstetric notes and case histories.
The effects of various risk factors relating to HCV perinatal transmission should be evaluated using unconditional logistic regression analysis. According to Steininger et al (2003), this is because HCV load may change with time, meaning that only qualitative and quantitative HCV-PCR results that have been obtained in samples can only be taken within a period of 150 days both before and after the delivery period. This is often done in order to be used for the estimation of the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HCV.
When does mother to child transmission of hepatitis C virus occur?
Method
Study design: Prospective cohort study
Research question: When is the rate of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis C virus within the first three days of the child’s life?
Sampling: HCV infected mothers and their newborn children who have been tested within three days of birth.
Measures: polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results of HCV RNA.
Results suggest that between one-third one-half of infected children acquire an infection in utero. Postpartum transmission is cannot be completely excluded; the suggestion given by available data that it is rare.
According to Mok et al (2005), at least one-third of infants get HCV during the intrauterine period. The research that led them to this conclusion was based on a prospective cohort approach and was done on 54 children with HCV, who had been tested less than three days after birth. Seventeen children (31%) of the children were positive during the first days of life and were assumed to have gotten the infection in utero. A sex association was not noted in testing positive for PCR.
It was noted that children who had evidence of intrauterine infection had a high probability of being of low birth weight. However, children who were born to HCV/HIV co-infected women were noted to be PCR positive within the first 3 days since birth. However, this difference failed to reach a level of statistical significance (Mok et al, 2005). According to Mok et al (2005), the role that genotypes play in mechanism and timing of infections needs to be explored even further.
Mok et al (2005) say that the rate of HCV mother-to-child transmission infection ranges between 4% and 10%. Maternal HIV/HCV co-infection has been closely linked with a four-fold increase in transmission of HCV infection. Mok et al (2005) indicate that women with HCV have a higher likelihood of transmitting the virus compared to non-viraemic women. Although transmission through breastfeeding is considered to be rare, it cannot be excluded. The study by Mok et al (2005) was based on the need to determine the exact time when vertical transmission of HCV takes place. The determination of such a time would be very helpful in the development of successful strategies of preventing mother-to-child transmission as well as other HCV-associated factors.
Just like in Steininger et al (2003), the study by Mok et al (2005) involved the use of clinical and virological characteristics, only that this time round, the data being considered is one relating to the first three days of the infants’ lives. Two groups of infants were formed: those who were PCR-positive and those who were PCR-negative. The sex and the mode of delivery are not associated with the condition of being PCR positive in an infant’s first three days of life (Mok et al, 2005). In each group, medial gestation was 39 weeks; in the first group, the range was between 33and 41 weeks while in the second group, the range was between 34 and 41 weeks.
In this research, a multivariate analysis was not done since it was impossible to do so with only 54 children. Meanwhile, bivariate odd ratios calculations were made whereby one factor was adjusted for at a time, whenever this was possible. The odd ratio for maternal HIV infection effects increased within a range of 2.42 to 7.50 (97%).
In a discussion of the study, it was highlighted that one of the 37 infants who turned out to be HCV-negative within three days after birth was considered to be infected because of the positive results of antibody tests done within 18 months. After the initial result that revealed that 37 infants were PCR-negative, other tests were done three months later, whereby 27 of these infants were PCR-positive. For the remaining infants, the second tests were done after 6 and seven months respectively. By seven months of age, 33 out of 36 infants were PCR positive. The remaining three infants had turned positive by 12, 13, and 15 month respectively. One of these three infants had been breastfed for 12 weeks while the other two had not been breastfed. It was difficult to determine the timing of the infection 12 infants in group 2 who turned positive for PCR tests later in life. These infants either had been breastfed or they had late negative PCR test results generated (Mok et al, 2005).
Obstetric management of hepatitis C-positive mothers: analysis of vertical transmission in 559 mother-infant pairs
Method
Study design: the study was carried out through a retrospective review of mothers who were HCV-positive and their pregnancy outcomes.
Research question: how does obstetric management of HCV-positive mothers determine the rate of vertical transmission of HCV infection?
Sampling: 74,629 deliveries were studied, 559 liveborn of whom were born to 545 HCV-positive mothers;
Measures: HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) was tested for both infants and mothers. For mothers, the tests were done antenatally.
Findings: the vertical transmission rate for HCV was 4.1%. These results failed to support the recommendations involving planned cesarean in order to reduce vertical transmission of HCV infection.
The objective of this study by McMenamin et al (2008) was to assess vertical transmission rates of HCV in the 2 tertiary level maternity units. The study was conducted in the form of a retrospective review of hepatitis C positive mothers vis-à-vis their pregnancy outcomes. The rate of HCV infection in the 74.649 deliveries that produced 559 liveborn infants born to 545 HCV-infected mothers was 0.7%. During the neonatal period, the number infants who tested negative for HCV were 423, whereas 18 (3.2%) were positive. Follow-ups for 21.1% of the infants were not possible and therefore, their outcomes were not accounted for in the research. Among HCV-negative mothers, no single case of vertical transmission was noted.
McMenamin et al (2008) concluded that the vertical transmission rate for HCV was 4.1%. The findings were contrary to the recommendation that a planned caesarean be organized for purposes of reducing vertical transmission of HCV.
Results and Conclusions
In article 1, it was found out that mothers should not be discouraged from breastfeeding or delivering through elective CS on account of their HCV status alone. This is because there were no significant changes in transmission risk as a result of breastfeeding or undergoing CS.
In the article 2, Elective cesarean section (CS) delivery was found to have no protective effect on HCV vertical transmission. These results are similar to those of the first article.
In the third article, the conclusion made was that the rate of HCV transmission was not influenced by type of feeding or delivery, or the mother’s HIV status. For this reason, co-infection was noted to have no influence on changes in transmission risk.
In article 4, it was found out that HCV/HIV co-infection rate was higher compared to that of mothers who were not HIV-infected. These results are contradictory to those of article 3. HCV transmission risk was lower when CS was done before the membrane rupture compared to vaginal delivery.
In Article 5, the findings were that infantile hypnoxia, high maternal viremia and intrapartum exposure increased HCV transmission risk. The suggestion made here is that it is during these events that the risk of vertical transmission of HCV is at its highest level.
In article 6, the findingssuggest that between one third one half of infected children acquire infection in utero. Postpartum transmission is cannot be completely excluded; the suggestion given by available data that it is rare.
In article 7, it was found out that the vertical transmission rate for HCV was 4.1%. These results failed to support the recommendations involving planned cesarean in order to reduce vertical transmission of HCV infection.
Discussion
Research on mother-to-child transmission of HCV infection has been going on for a very long time. Zuccotti & Ribero (1995) evaluated vertical transmission among 37 pregnant women. Twenty of these women had both HCV and HIV antibodies. HIV-positive women had the HCV sub-types 3a and 1a. Infection with the ribonucleic acid of HCV and the antibody of HIV were noted in 30.7% of 13 women as well as 25 % of the women who had HCV RNA alone. The research’s findings resembled those that had been arrived at by Kurauchi (1993) only that in the latter case, emphasis was in the perinatal period alone, with specific attention being put on breast milk, contamination with maternal blood and vaginal discharge. In these researches, the results appeared to be inconclusive as far as the transmission risk is concerned.
This study has revealed that those mothers should not be discouraged from breastfeeding or delivering through elective CS solely on account of their HCV status. These results followed lack of significant changes in transmission risk even after mothers continued to breastfeed their children or underwent elective CS.
Weiner & Thaler (1993) found out a unique, predominant variant of hepatitis C virus in infants born to mothers with multiple variants. According to Lam & McOmish (1993), a human immunodeficiency virus infection is not a significant co-factor in transmission of mother-to child infection of HCV. All these are results of early researches on various factors that were thought to affect mother-to-child transmission of Hepatitic C virus. The results of some of these researches have been proven to be wrong in subsequent researches. For instance, Riva (2005) noted that HIV was an important factor in transmission of HCV infection from the mother to the child.
In this research, there was a contradiction on whether HCV/HIV co-infection increased the risk of HCV vertical transmission or not. Additionally, the researches analyzed failed to pinpoint the effect of co-infection on the time when vertical transmission takes place. However, there are many other confounding factors that influence the co-infection transmission risk, such as the choice between vaginal delivery and CS delivery.
The finding that elective CS delivery has no protective effect on the risk HCV transmission risk is very significant and it is poised to affect the approach that is taken in dealing with mother-to-child transmission. However, for mothers of infected children, the duration of ROM was noted to be significantly longer than that of mothers of uninfected children. Through multivariate analysis, the finding relating to co-infected women being more likely to transmit the virus appeared to be not statistically significant.
In a world where 3% of the entire world’s population is infected with the HCV virus, the findings are very significant. Estimates of mother-to-child transmission risks range between 3% and 10%, something about which researchers have not been very enthusiastic about when it comes to research work. In fact, majority of researchers have been focusing on only infant feeding and mode of feeding as the expense of statistical analyses. Focus on the former areas is motivated by the widely held notion that they are very amenable to intervention. Little attention is given to retrospective studies and analyses, a situation that makes the available findings on vertical transmissions lack sufficient statistical power.
Maternal HCV load seems like a predominant risk factor of HCV mother-to-child transmission. This, though, has not yet been fully quantified in in-depth studies. However, it is supported by consistent findings that indicate an increase in risk among women who are co-infected with both HCV and HIV. For these women, it is thought that HCV loads are secondary to the immunosuppression that is HIV-driven. However, HIV positive women are today being treated using potent antiretroviral therapy (ART) which plays a crucial role of improving response to immunity as well as reducing HIV transmission. The issue of whether such a form of treatment has an impact on HCV transmission remains to be addressed by medical researchers.
The research that showed that HIV/HCV co-infection had no influence on transmission risk or duration was done using clinical and virological investigations. On the other hand, the one that attributed an increase in risk of transmission to HIV/HCV co-infection was conducted using the prospective cohort study. It is possible that the research method applied was responsible for the contradictions in outcomes. There is need for a change of research methods in order for consistency of findings to be determined.
Multivariate analysis is the most commonly used method of analysis in epidemiology research on HCV mother-to-child transmission (European Pediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network (2005), Steininger et al, 2003), Mok et al (2005), Novati et al (1992), Zanetti (1999), Resti (1998), Okamoto (2000), Lin (1994). In other researches, clinical and virological data were analyzed in order for various factors, including HCV/HIV co-infection, breast feeding, caesarian section, contamination in maternal blood and vaginal delivery issues to be studied (Schröter (2000), Ferrero (2003), Polywka & Feucht (1997), Yeung (2001).
Earlier researches where clinical and virological data analysis methods were used seemed to yield different results compared to those ones where unconditional logistic regression analysis and prospective cohort methods were used. The use of unconditional logistic regression analysis in studying HCV perinatal transmission and other related factors was recommended, especially in small samples, where multivariate or bivariate regression analyses could not be used Inoue & Takeuchi (1992), (Ruiz-Extremera, 2000), (Paccagnini & Principi, 1995), (Matsubara, Sumazaki & Takita, 1995).
Bias
One of the causes of biases was lack of follow-up on some of the mothers, children or mother-child pairs being surveyed. Some samples were too small to be subjected to certain methods of data analysis. Confounding factors could also be a source of bias in the research outcomes. Co-infection, for instance was a major confounding factor in the process of determining the exact time when vertical transmission takes place.
Confounding Factors
One of the most controversial variables in this research was the effect that the mode of delivery has on vertical transmission. the outcomes tended to be determined by the confounding factors that were taken into consideration. The choice of confounding factors was deatermined by the circumstances under which the various studies were being carried out.
Strengths and Weaknesses and Errors
McMenamin et al (2008) observes that it was impossible to follow up on 21% of all infants in his study. This negatively affected the outcomes of the research. Similar problems were encountered in management of patients as well as data concerning them. Additionally, he notes that in other studies, the default rate tends to range from 8% to 50%. This is one of the areas where improvement is needed in future researches.
Nearly all the researchers were not able to deliver conclusive and significant data to show that caesarean delivery had a protective effect in reducing the risk of vertical transmission of HCV infection. When a large number of cases were controlled for viral load, there was need for absolute care to be taken in order for a type 2 error to be avoided.
Conclusion
Transmission of HCV infection from mother to child remains a very nagging issue in today’s HCV research. Recent researches have resulted in the various significant findings relating to transmission patterns, duration of transmission, and prenatal risk factors. The methodologies used have ranged from multivariate analysis to unconditional logistic regression analysis. When clinical and virological data sources are used, the outcomes seem to differ slightly depending on the methodological approaches used to analyze it.
There is a need for various vertical transmission risk factors to be identified in the case of HCV just as it has been done previously in the case of HCV-1. Today, the most significant findings relate to the effect of elective CS, breast feeding, HCV-contamination in maternal blood and HIV/HCV co-infection.
References
Conte, D., Fraquelli, M., Prati, M., Colucci, A. & Minola, E. (2000). Prevalence and Clinical Course of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection and Rate of HCV Vertical Transmission in a Cohort of 15,250 Pregnant Women, Hepatology, March 2000.
European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network (2001). Effects of mode of delivery and infant feeding on the risk of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis C virus, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 108, 371-377
European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network (2005). A Significant Sex—but Not Elective Cesarean Section—Effect on Mother-to-Child Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus Infection, JID:192
Ferrero, S. (2003).Prospective study of mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C virus: a 10-year survey (1990-2000), Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 82(3), p.229-234.
Gibb, D., Goodall, L. & Dunn, T. (2000). Mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis C virus: evidence for preventable peripartum transmission, The Lancet 356, September 9, 2000.
Inoue, Y. & Takeuchi, K. (1992). Silent Mother-to-Child Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus through Two Generations Determined by Comparative Nucleotide Sequence Analysis of the Viral cDNA, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 166(6) 1425-1428.
Kurauchi, O. (1993). Studies on transmission of hepatitis C virus from mother-to-child in the perinatal period, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 253(3) 121-126.
Lam, J. & McOmish, F. (1993). Infrequent Vertical Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 167(3), p.572-576.
Lin, H. (1994). Possible Role of High-Titer Maternal Viremia in Perinatal Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 169(3), 638-641.
Matsubara, T., Sumazaki, R. & Takita, H. (1995). Mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C virus: A prospective study, European Journal of Pediatrics, 154(12), 973-978.
McMenamin, M., Jackson, A., Lambert, J. et al (2008). Obstetric management of hepatitis C-positive mothers: analysis of vertical transmission in 559 mother-infant pairs, Am J Obstet Gynecol 199 (1), 315.e1-315.e5.
Mok, J., Pembrey, L., Tovo, P. et al. (2005). When does mother to child transmission of hepatitis C virus occur? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 90 (2), 156-160
Novati, R., Thiers, V., A., Monforte, D., et al (1992) Mother-to-Child Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus Detected by Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 165(4), 720-723.
Okamoto, M. (2000) Prospective Reevaluation of Risk Factors in Mother‐to‐Child Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus: High Virus Load, Vaginal Delivery, and Negative Anti‐NS4 Antibody, The Journal of Infectious Diseases 182:1511–1514.
Paccagnini, S. & Principi, N. (1995) Perinatal transmission and manifestation of hepatitis C virus infection in a high risk population, The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 14(3).
Polywka, S. & Feucht, H. (1997). Hepatitis C virus infection in pregnancy and the risk of mother-to-child transmission, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 16(2) 121-124
Resti, M. (1998). Mother to child transmission of hepatitis C virus: prospective study of risk factors and timing of infection in children born to women seronegative for HIV-1, BMJ 317, 437-441
Riva, C. (2005). Human immunodeficiency virus infection as risk factor for mother-to-child hepatitis C virus transmission; Persistence of anti-hepatitis C virus in children is associated with the mother’s anti-hepatitis C virus immunoblotting pattern, Hepatology, 21 (2), 328 – 332
Ruiz-Extremera, A. (2000). Follow-up of transmission of hepatitis C to babies of human immunodeficiency virus-negative women: the role of breast-feeding in transmission,The Pediatric Infectious disease Journal: 19(6), 511-516
Schröter,M. (2000). Detection of TT Virus DNA and GB Virus Type C/Hepatitis G Virus RNA in Serum and Breast Milk: Determination of Mother-to-Child Transmission, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 38(2) 745-747
Steininger, C., Kundi, M., Jatzko, G., Kiss, H., Lischka, A. & Holzmann, H. (2003). Increased Risk of Mother-to-Infant Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus by Intrapartum Infantile Exposure to Maternal Blood, JID:187(1) 345-351
Weiner, A. & Thaler, M. (1993) A unique, predominant hepatitis C virus variant found in an infant born to a mother with multiple variants, Journal of Virology, 67(7), 4365-4368.
Yeung, L. (2001). Mother-to-Infant Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus, Hepatology ,August 2001 Retrieved on May 5, 2010 from http://sadieo.ucsf.edu/course/things/pre-2005/Yeung.pdf
Zanetti, A. (1999). Mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C virus, Journal of Hepatology, 31, 96-100
Zuccotti, G. & Ribero, M. (1995) Effect of hepatitis C genotype on mother-to-infant transmission of virus, The Journal of Pediatrics, 127(2), 278-280.