Ethics Masters paper

Question

Tragic events detract people from their normal ethical stance. Why do you think this is the case? Bring forward a tragic event that has happened in your lifetime as an example and explain whether your ethical stance shifted during that time. If you could go back in time, would you choose to handle the situation differently? Why or why not?
Your journal entry must be at least 200 words. No references or citations are necessary

Answer

Why Tragic Events Detract People from Their Normal Ethical Stance

In human life, incidences that lead to pain and affliction are bound to happen. In most cases, such situations are unexpected and cause the victim to respond in a manner that is sometimes not well thought-out. Tragedy, an incident associated with significant loss due to flaws in personality or moral failure, arouses a blaming attitude that detracts people from their usual ethical stance. This paper address why this is the case. As a corollary, I set out to illustrate a tragic event that has happened in my life.

ORDER NOW

The “why” question often crosses the mind whenever unclear tragic incidences occur. In a dramatic situation, the victim is in denial and is vulnerable to a frantic search for answers as to why the tragedy had to strike. The human nature operates is such a way that we are always quick to apportion blame. Consequently, I think in a normal circumstance, the victim tends to accuse persons directly linked to the tragedy of lacking a moral obligation. This view provokes thoughts relating to a possible scenario in which the tragedy would have been avoided altogether.

I once encountered a tragic situation during an incidence when my father suddenly felt a sharp pain in his ribs. I did not waste any time; I quickly rushed him to his doctor, a highly competent and committed healthcare professional. Unfortunately, after attending to him for six hours, he announced that my dad had passed on. I held the doctor by his collar and beat him up. This action was provoked by my desperate thought that the doctor was competent enough to save my father`s life but did not do enough to do so.At that point, my ethical stance had shifted since I usually take my time to analyze situations before acting. This time,things were different. I acted before thinking about the ethical implications of those actions. If the incidence could be reversed, I would first find out what my father`s health state was and what exactly caused his ultimate demise. I would first and foremost have been cognizant of the fact that this doctor had always taken charge of my dad`s health and I appreciated his service.