acute respiratory failure concepts

The purpose of this paper is to address acute respiratory failure concepts. Please review the rubric to ensure you have met the assignment criteria. The expected length of the paper is approximately 4-5 pages, which does not include the cover and references page. Please use the following format to draft your paper:Introduction (including purpose statement)Describe the pathophysiology of acute respiratory failure.Describe methods for assessing the patient with acute respiratory failure.Discuss medical management of the patient with acute respiratory failure.Formulate a plan of care for the patient with acute respiratory failure.Conclusion (this may be one short paragraph) In regards to APA format, please use the following as a guide:Include a cover page and running head (this is not part of the 4-5 page limit)Include transitions in your paper (i.e. headings or subheadings)Use in-text references throughout the paperUse double space, 12 point Times New Roman fontSpelling, grammar, and organization are appropriateInclude a reference list (this is not part of the 4-5 page limit)Attempt to use primary sources only. That said, you may cite reliable electronic sources (i.e. NCSBN, AANP) Acute Respiratory Failure AssignmentCriteriaNon-PerformanceBasicProficientDistinguishedDescribe and Discuss the pathophysiology of acute respiratory failure20%Does not Describe or Discuss the pathophysiology of acute respiratory failure Briefly explains the pathophysiology of acute respiratory failure Discuss the pathophysiology of acute respiratory failure Synthesizes the pathophysiology of acute respiratory failure Describe and discuss methods for assessing the patient with acute respiratory failure20%Does not describe or discuss methods for assessing the patient with acute respiratory failure Briefly explains methods for assessing the patient with acute respiratory failure Apply methods for assessing the patient with acute respiratory failure Synthesizes methods for assessing the patient with acute respiratory failure Describe and discuss medical management of the patient with acute respiratory failure.20% Does not discuss or describe medical management of the patient with acute respiratory failureBriefly explains the medical management of the patient with acute respiratory failureDescribe and discuss medical management of the patient with acute respiratory failureSynthesizes medical management of the patient with acute respiratory failureCreate a plan of care for a patient with acute respiratory failure20%Does not create a plan of create for a patient with acute respiratory failure Briefly explains a plan of create for a patient with acute respiratory failure Discuss a plan of create for a patient with acute respiratory failure Synthesizes a plan of create for a patient with acute respiratory failure Paper if formatted in APA correctly. Uses in-text citation and has a minimum of 3 appropriate references. Referenced correctly.20%Does not follow APA format throughout activity. Does not have reference or use in-text citations.Paper is written poorly and uses first or second person. Has no in-text citations has a reference.Paper follows some, but not all of APA format rules. Has in-text citation, but some are incorrect, has 2 referencesFollows APA format is followed throughout paper. Uses in-text citation, and 3 references correctly. Paper is formatted correctly. Paper has introductions and conclusion RubricPost Licensure BSN Assignment 9.2019Post Licensure BSN Assignment 9.2019Criteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntentional Learning and Reflection15 ptsExemplaryIdentifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides direction for the content that is engaging and thought provoking. The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the presentation. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.10 ptsAccomplishedIdentifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides adequate direction for the content with some degree of interest for the reader. The thesis states the position, premise, or hypothesis, and is the focal point of the paper for the most part. Demonstrates an understanding and some critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Adequately compares/contrasts perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions but broader connections and/or implications are not as thoroughly explored5 ptsDevelopingIdentifies a research topic but may be too broad in scope and/or the thesis is somewhat unclear and needs to be developed further. Focal point is not consistently maintained throughout the paper. Demonstrates general understanding with limited critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Summarizes perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions.0 ptsUnsatisfactory – BeginningFails to identify a relevant research topic or is not clearly defined and/or the paper lacks focus throughout. Demonstrates a lack of understanding and inadequate analysis of the research topic and thesis. Analysis is superficial based on opinions and preferences rather than critical analysis.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecision Making and Clinical Reasoning15 ptsExemplaryProvides compelling and accurate evidence to support in-depth analysis to the central position beyond the required (2) research sources with at least 1 source from a periodical database. Research sources are highly relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old) and reliable and add to the strength of the content.10 ptsAccomplishedProvides essential, accurate evidence to support the central position with the required (2) research sources including 1 source from a periodical database that are mostly relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old) and reliable.5 ptsDevelopingProvides some evidence to support the central position with less than 2 acceptable research sources. Some sources may not be relevant, accurate, and reliable, greater than 5 years old and may not be from scholarly sources.0 ptsUnsatisfactory – BeginningLacks sufficient research sources to support the central position and/or, if included, are generally not relevant, accurate, or reliable. Contains numerous factual mistakes, omissions, or oversimplifications.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Presentation15 ptsExemplaryContent is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flows smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, and spacing are optimal for audience viewing10 ptsAccomplishedContent is adequately organized. Ideas are arranged reasonably with a progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes required components of an introduction, body, and conclusion. For a slide presentation, one or more components of the design, font size, style, and spacing may be less than ideal for audience viewing.5 ptsDevelopingContent is somewhat organized. For a paper, occasionally ideas from paragraph to paragraph may not flow well and/or connect to the central position or be clear as a whole. May be missing a required component and/or components may be less than complete. For a slide presentation, multiple aspects of the design require further development for optimal audience viewing.0 ptsUnsatisfactory – BeginningContent lacks logical organization and impedes readers’ comprehension of ideas. For a paper, central position is rarely evident from paragraph to paragraph and/or the paper is missing multiple required components. For a slide presentation, the design lacks clarity for optimal viewing by an audience.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and APA Formatting15 ptsExemplaryContent is well written and uses standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. APA guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. Includes in-text citations and references that are written correctly.10 ptsAccomplishedContent shows above average writing style and clarity in writing using standard English. Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or formatting. APA guidelines for formatting are present. In-text citations are present but may not be complete or correctly formatted. References are written using correct APA format5 ptsDevelopingContent shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Use of APA guidelines are generally present, however are incorrectly formatted.0 ptsUnsatisfactory – BeginningContent shows a below average/poor writing style lacking in elements of appropriate standard English. Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Lacks elements required in writing a formal APA paper: title page, references, in-text citations, headers.15 ptsTotal Points: 60