Economic Effects of Corporate Prisons

Question

Annotated Bibliography: To help prepare for your Final Research Project, write an annotated bibliography to indicate the quality of the sources you have read. The bibliography must include no less than five scholarly sources that will be used to support the major points of the Final Research Project. Critical thinking skills need to be demonstrated by accurately interpreting evidence used to support various positions of the topic. Please make sure to provide full reference information in accordance with APA style. Write a brief paragraph (around 150 words) summarizing the source and explaining how it is pertinent and relevant to the topic of the project and how each source will support your thesis statement.  Use the blow listed sources please: Austin, J., & Coventry, G. (2001). Emerging issues on privatized prisons. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/181249.pdf American Civil Liberties Union (2011). Banking on bondage: Private prisons and mass incarceration. ACLU. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/banking-bondage-private-prisons-and-mass-incarceration Brown, A. (1994). “Economic aspects of prison privatization: The Queensland experience.” In Biles, D., & Vernon, J. (Eds). Private sector and community involvement in the criminal justice system: Proceedings of a conference held 30 November – 2 December 1992. Wellington, New Zealand. http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/proceedings/23/brown.pdf Kirchhoff, S. (2010). Economic impacts of prison growth. Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41177.pdf Mason, C. (2012). Too good to be true. Washington, D.C: Sentencing Project.  http://sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Too-Good-to-be-True-Private-Prisons-in-America.pdf

Links for the sources

Answer

Annotated Bibliography: Economic Effects of Cooperate Prisons

Name:

Institution:

Annotated Bibliography: Economic Effects of the Cooperate Prisons

Austin, J. & Coventry, G. (2001). Emerging issues on privatized prisons. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 1-14.

In this article, the authors argue that due to the recent overcrowding of correctional facilities today, privatization of these facilities does come as a solution to the corrections problem. According to the authors, privatizing correctional facilities is a great idea because the government savings on revenue, which it can then allocate to the construction of correctional facilities and other pressing public issues which may then lead to economic development. Moreover, private correction management companies do lead to economic development due to the involvement of local resource mobilization and the creation of employment to local communities. However, it is noted that these privatized entities tend to operate in much the same way as their traditional counterparts. This source is beneficial for the study because it sheds light on many economic issues relating to the introduction of privatized prisons.

ORDER A PAPER LIKE THIS NOW

Brown, A. (1994). “Economic aspects of prison privatization: The Queensland experience.” In Biles, D., & Vernon, J. (Eds). Private sector and community involvement in the criminal justice system: Proceedings of a conference held 30 November – 2 December 1992. Wellington: Peak Books. Pp. 106-113.

            The author of this article argues that in Queensland, just like in the USA, the cost-efficiency of prison privatization is not yet proven. However, he notes that low labor costs are a major benefit arising from this approach. In this regard, the main benefits include job opportunities, improved standards of living for the employed staff, and increased revenue generation for the government and the private sector alike. This article provides a new dimension to the debate by creating the impression that further research is needed to ascertain the truth or falsity of claims relating to cost efficiency of corporate prisons.

Kirchhoff, S. (2010). Economic impacts of prison growth. Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service. 1-10

            This article reports on the expanding U.S. corrections system and the challenges being posed by this situation particularly on the economic realm. For example, municipalities across the country are struggling to rein on costs by reducing prison populations. At the same time, some states, for example, Arizona, are contemplating selling their prison facilities to private firms. In the author’s view, the success of a private prisons does fully depend on the services that they provide but rather, on the systems based on which they operate. For example, there is an emerging reality of private prisons’ dependence on large populations of inmates for them to function cost-efficiently. This article is important because it helps one understand the expenditure of both public and private prisons and also the dependence of this prisons system on public funds.

American Civil Liberties Union (2011). Banking on bondage: Private prisons and mass incarceration. ACLU, 9-30

            This article illustrates how profit-focused this private corrections organizations are and how they tend to make false promises in order to maximize on commercial returns. It also explains how they are focused on detaining massive numbers of prisoners than their public counterparts. Unlike the latter, which are focused on reforming these prisoners so that they can go back to the society the former simply seek to cash in on the situation of moral failure. The article further explains the advantages of these private correctional facilities particularly in terms of cost efficiency. This article is useful in the study of the economic behaviours of private correctional facilities.

Mason, C. (2012). Too good to be true. Washington, D.C: Sentencing Project.

This article explains how cooperate prisons emerged and the process of modern prison privatization. Privatization is portrayed as a highly politicized process. It also explains the economic impact of massive incarcerations in America and what this means for the privatization process particularly efforts to reform the system of employing staff in prisons. It also illustrates the long term impacts such as concentrated poverty. More importantly, the study raises questions regarding savings purported to arise from the adoption of corporate prisons. This article is demonstrably important since it raises candid concerns regarding current claims of economic viability of private prisons.

References

Austin, J., & Coventry, G. (2001). Emerging issues on privatized prisons. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Brown, A. (1994). “Economic aspects of prison privatization: The Queensland experience.” In Biles, D., & Vernon, J. (Eds). Private sector and community involvement in the criminal justice system: Proceedings of a conference held 30 November – 2 December 1992. Wellington: Peak Books. Pp. 106-113.

Kirchhoff, S. (2010). Economic impacts of prison growth. Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service.

American Civil Liberties Union (2011). Banking on bondage: Private prisons and mass incarceration. ACLU.

Mason, C. (2012). Too good to be true. Washington, D.C: Sentencing Project.