health conditions among older adults

This assignment entails the development of a narrated (voiceover) Power Point Presentation (PPP) on a cardiovascular health problem among older adults. Under the ‘notes’ section of each slide, please write your narration. Plan to talk for about 10-15 minutes, which may translate to 9 – 12 slides. When including in-text citations, use only stated facts like dates or figures. Document your citation references in the notes section of the same slide. The Purdue Online Writing Lab has great resources on how to develop an effective PPP. See website: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/686/01/ (Links to an external site.)A zero will be given for all Hallmark assignments submitted late.Submission Parameters:Please use the following criteria to develop your PPP:Introductory slide with at least 2 presentation objectives (1 slide)Provide an overview of health conditions among older adults (i.e. Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension, COPD, etc.) (1-2 slides)Provide an overview of the cardiovascular system in older adults (2-3 slides)Discuss factors that contribute to the changes in the myocardium and show an image of the changes (2-3 slides) (Provide a reference of the image(s)).Discuss two age-associated changes in arterial structure and function and subsequent cardiac conditions (i.e. electrocardiogram changes, left ventricular changes, heart failure and myocardial infarction, conduction and beta-adrenergic changes, etc.) (2-3 slides)Summary and concluding statements (1 slide)List of References in APA formatIn regards to APA format, please use the following as a guide:Use references throughout the Power Point PresentationApply appropriate spelling, grammar, and organization throughout the PresentationInclude a reference list at the end of the PresentationAttempt to use primary sources only. That said, you may cite reliable electronic s00 level Hallmark Rubric400 level Hallmark RubricCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntentional Learning, Reflection, and Clinical Judgment65 to >59.0 ptsExemplaryIdentifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides direction for the content that is engaging and thought provoking. The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the presentation/paper. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and Evaluates original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.59 to >54.0 ptsAccomplishedIdentifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides adequate direction for the content with some degree of interest for the reader. 60% or more of the thesis states the position, premise, or hypothesis, and is the focal point of the presentation/paper. Demonstrates an understanding and some critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Adequately compares/contrasts perspectives, counterarguments, or opposing positions but broader connections and/or implications are explored (>60%).54 to >49.0 ptsDevelopingIdentifies a research topic but is too broad in scope and/or the thesis is unclear and needs to be developed further. Focal point is not consistently maintained throughout the presentation/paper. Demonstrates a general understanding (0 ptsUnsatisfactory – BeginningFails to identify a relevant research topic or is not clearly defined and/or the presentation/paper lacks focus throughout. Demonstrates a lack of understanding and inadequate analysis of the research topic and thesis (49.0 ptsExemplaryProduces compelling and accurate evidence to support in-depth analysis to the central position beyond the required (4) research sources with at least 2 sources from a periodical database. Research sources are relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old) and reliable and add to the strength of the content.49 to >44.0 ptsAccomplishedProduces essential, accurate evidence to support the central position with the required (3) research sources including 1 source from a periodical database that are relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old) and reliable.44 to >40.0 ptsDevelopingProduces evidence to support the central position with less than 2 acceptable research sources. Sources may not be relevant, accurate, and reliable, greater than 5 years old and may not be from scholarly sources.40 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory – BeginningLacks sufficient research sources to support the central position and/or, if included, are not relevant, accurate, or reliable. Contains numerous factual mistakes, omissions, or oversimplifications.55 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Presentation45 to >40.0 ptsExemplaryIdeas are arranged logically, flows smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components uses provided template. For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, speaker notes/narration and spacing are optimal for audience viewing. For a slide presentation that is a group project collaboration among team members is evident and there are peer reviews completed. Slide presentation rules: · 6×6 bullet points, · Font ≥ 20 · Notes associated with each slide. · Includes the required number of slides, excluding Title and Reference slides in the count. · The presentation uses appropriate images or animation.40 to >35.0 ptsAccomplisheddeas are arranged reasonably with a progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components uses provided template. For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, speaker notes/narration and spacing are optimal for audience viewing. For a slide presentation that is a group project collaboration among team members is evident and there are peer reviews completed. Slide presentation rules: · 6×6 bullet points, · Font ≥ 20 · Notes associated with each slide. · Includes the required number of slides, excluding Title and Reference slides in the count. · The presentation uses appropriate images or animation.35 to >30.0 ptsDevelopingFor a paper, ideas may not flow well and/or connect to the central position. May be missing a required component and/or components in the provided template. For a slide presentation, multiple aspects (the design, font size, style, speaker notes/narration and spacing) require further development for optimal audience viewing. For a slide presentation that is a group project collaboration among team members is not evident and there are no peer reviews completed. Slide presentation rules: · 6×6 bullet points, · Font ≥ 20 · Notes associated with each slide. · Includes the required number of slides, excluding Title and Reference slides in the count. · The presentation uses appropriate images or animation.30 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory – BeginningContent lacks logical organization and impedes readers’ comprehension of ideas. For a paper, central position is not evident, or the paper is missing multiple required components of the template. For a slide presentation, the design lacks (the design, font size, style, speaker notes/narration and spacing) for optimal viewing by an audience. For a slide presentation that is a group project collaboration among team members is not evident and there are no peer reviews completed. Slide presentation rules: · 6×6 bullet points, · Font ≥ 20 · Notes associated with each slide. · Includes the required number of slides, excluding Title and Reference slides in the count. · The presentation uses appropriate images or animation.45 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and APA Formatting35 to >30.0 ptsExemplaryStyle and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. APA 7th Edition guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. Includes in-text citations and references. May use 1st person writing as appropriate with the 7th edition APA.30 to >25.0 ptsAccomplishedStyle and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful, and varied throughout. Minimal (20.0 ptsDevelopingStyle and voice are appropriate to given audience and purpose. Repetitive mechanical or typographical errors (>5 but 0 ptsUnsatisfactory – BeginningStyle and voice are appropriate to given audience and purpose. Repetitive mechanical or typographical errors (>10). Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure and/or word choice. Lacks elements required in writing a formal APA 7th Edition presentation/paper: title page, references, in- text citations. May use 1st person writing as appropriate with the 7th edition APA.35 ptsTotal Points: 200