USA: +1 415 256 4347 
Sign in
Nature versus nutrition was one of the most disputed philosophical topics discussed throughout the century in the psychological profession. The topic of this essay is the conversation about nature as well as the nursery, yet nature influences human behavior; nutrition is more prevalent as the environment affects the expression of one’s gene. In his 1874 book Their Nature and Nurture, Francis Galton originated the term nature-nurture and maintained that intelligence and personality are inherited. Nature is called behavior and human qualities influenced by genetic and biological predispositions, whereas nutrition refers to or further explains behaviors that have been taken up due to the environment and experiences. Human behavior can be defined as “the potential and expressed ability to exercise physical, mental and social activities in the life stages.”
After considerable investigation, I found that both nutrition and nature have a greater prevalence of the behavior of a person in nutrition than nature. There was a better comprehension of both subjects and, although many empirical investigations on this problematic subject have been conducted, the debate remains whether nature or nourishment is responsible for human behavior. Researchers on all sides of nature and nutrition believe that the link between a gene and a behavior is not as wide as environment and conduct. Although a gene may actually enhance the likelihood of behavior, it does not explain for the way people do things. There is a question of choice and free will, while you grow up depending on the environment in which you live and assimilate may result in different behavioral results. An example of this is when two identical twins are placed in separate settings, yet they have a similar genomic structure. Social scientists are more aware of the degree of interaction between nature and nutrition. As mentioned above, the presence of genes not only ensures that a certain attribute is obvious, since genes require adequate circumstances to fully articulate their anticipated predispositions. These “appropriate habitats” are not only natural surroundings but also social and symbolic environments for persons. Nature clearly depends on nutrition; nonetheless, both must coexist to shape the behavior of an individual.
